|
CJurasin (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
joaq: You forget that the oil companies own ALOT of stock in many car companies! In the late 1950s in Tacoma (Washington) there was a Dentist (car hobbiest on the side) who invented a carboretor that (was tested) and was getting 60-75 MPG on a V8!. He tried distributing his carb and was quickly closed down. He was FORCED to sell his patent and the carb was then hushed up and SHELVED. The oil companies are FAR bigger than most people know, and will do ANYTHING to protect their investments.
joaquinveyron (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Is my English really this bad? What's wrong with it? "Hihi ... and then I would not see the reason why to believe why a Billy Bob hick like the guy in this video should be able, all in a sudden, to tap into "parallel" universes, while he is talking about "magnetic" engines, which are utter rubbish in itself. It is like trying to gain kinetic energy sustainably from rolling a ball downhill (which is not possible, because after a certain time you need to roll it uphill again)"
joaquinveyron (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I posted the last comment to your comment: "Yeah, he'll sell it next year. You can tell by the video quality that this video is MANY YEARS old already. It's always fun to laugh at over-unity claims though. For those reading, I do not care HOW you tweak something, you can never get more energy out than in. You might be able to tap zero point energy or siphon energy from a parallel universe or so other exotic idea but that's still NOT over-unity. The energy MUST come from somewhere."
r00tcause (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Yes and I have no idea why you are implying that I ever said this was real or that he was capable of "tapping into a parallel dimension". I was speaking hypothetically and your english is obviously bad so you've misinterpreted it all. I will speak this plain and clear. This is a scam, perpetual motion is not possible and I am fully aware of this fact.
joaquinveyron (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Hihi ... and then I would no see the reason to believe why a Billy Bob hick like the guy in this video should, all in a sudden, be able to tap into "parallel" universe and stuff, whereas he is talking about "magnetic" engines, which is utter rubbish in itself, it is like trying to gain kinetic energy sustainably from rolling a ball downhill (which is not possible, because at point of time you need to roll it uphill again)
joaquinveyron (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Which crap are you talking, the one in the video I only can assume?
r00tcause (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You're preaching to the choir man. Tell it to someone who believes this crap. :)
joaquinveyron (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
- Completely ignore that so far none of these "free-Energy-crooks" allowed their "inventions" to be neutrally evaluated nor have they performed a public demonstration successfully. A claim alone is sufficient evidence.
- Of course there are evil, evil oil companies to prevent such "inventions" (hihi, they couldn't care less about this shit). Sure, oil companies want to stay in business, but who could stop a car company to launch a "free energy" car to the market, when they would make trillions!
joaquinveyron (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
- Conspiracy theories are invented, hihihi to explain why this baloney does not work
- they like seeing themselves as "Out-of-the-box thinkers" because Einstein has also done something that science could not predict (ignoring the fact that Einstein applied intuitively a scientific methodology that has guided him through observation, problem, explanation with existing theory, extension/ modification of the theory, experiment/attempt)
joaquinveyron (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It remains a mystery to me, how people can "argue" with their brain being amputated:
- Of course they do not think for one second, otherwise they could find that in history 1000s so called Perpetuum Mobile existed & none of them worked.
- they take a YT video (!!!) as scientific evidence
- they apparently do not like or ignore any scientific methodology, but do not care either if a proof has given empirically and are not interested in why none of the so-called "free energy" "inventions: worked |
